Briefly describe the ecological progress of zkSync, what unknown variables still exist in the process of decentralization?

Only 2 months after its launch, @zksyncERA has more than 680,000 independent wallet addresses, and the total ecological TVL has reached $338M, ranking fourth in layer2 Rank. Although the gap is not small compared with Arbitrum, the growth rate of its various data metrics indicates that this airdrop battle will definitely be swept into the sky. But what is the current progress of the zkSync ecology? What unknown variables remain in the process of decentralization? Next Thread, you must carefully consider it.

The current data volume cannot highlight the advantages of zk-rollup, and the user experience is not satisfactory. For example, people frequently complain about high gas fees, transaction failures, and unstable slippage. To put it simply, the mechanism of zk circuit transaction proof one by one is naturally costly, and the transaction rate, gas cost, silky experience, etc. must reach a balanced state after the ecological data reaches a certain volume. This is a process from quantitative change to qualitative change, and we need to wait and see.

zk-Rollup may be aiming to be the best after Mass Adpotion, but right now we have to think about how not to fall behind Arbitrum. appears in:

**1) The gold-absorbing ability of leading projects must be strengthened. **

Top DEX, Lending, and Derivative projects such as @syncswap, @ReactorFusionR, @OnchainTrade, etc., have further improved lockup value and yield, just like the pulling effect of the GMX growth engine on Arbitrum.

**2) The innovative advantages of the bottom layer of zk technology are yet to be released. **

Theoretically, compared to Arbitrum, zk-rollup can achieve a transaction volume of millions of TPS, and its decentralization is more extreme. However, at this stage, due to the complexity of zkSync’s PlONK circuit algorithm, the development compatibility problem is prominent, which brings great challenges to ecological expansion. serious challenge. This has greatly delayed the time for zkSync to release explosive products.

At present, @izumi_FinanceDL-AMM innovation mechanism remains to be seen.

3) The diversity and innovation of zkSync ecology is not enough

The potential of an ecology depends on its performance in categories such as Derivative derivatives, Lending lending, and Yield Aggregator machine gun pools, but zkSync is currently focusing on DEX interaction? Numeric domain name? Meme? Obviously these projects can gather popularity, but the continuous siphon effect is far less efficient than Farming Pool. Let's see if @HoldstationWAPY can stabilize.

Overall, the current development of the zkSync ecology is remarkable, but it is still in an early alpha state. Obviously, the market sentiment is expected to be high. Next, I will throw out a few potential unknown variables (risks) that I have observed. In short, Calm Down!

To put it simply: the issue of Sequencer’s POS privileged dominance in the future; the decentralized Validator is still overly controlled by MatterLabs; the underlying dynamic rate is unstable, and the open source problem of Plonk contracts, etc.

I complained about the centralization of op-rollup's Sequencer before, and zkSync's Sequencer is currently a centralized component run by MatterLabs. In the future, it will be decentralized based on the POS mechanism and authorization method (there are privileges, but not extreme enough).

However, zkSync's Sequencer cannot change the order, because once the transaction is changed, the zk-SNARK proof will also be invalid, so even if the ultimate decentralization is not achieved, fortunately, it cannot do evil.

The Validator is responsible for generating the SNARK proof of the transaction submitted by the Sequencer under the chain, and adding it to the Rollup chain of the new block after the cross-validation is correct.

Although in the final state, Validator (including zkPorter) must be absolutely decentralized, but at the current immature stage of the market, most of its validation nodes are still controlled and operated by the Matter Labs team. According to the Roadmap, the autonomy will be gradually decentralized.

**what does that mean? Are these Matter Labs highly controlled validator nodes secretly harvesting user IP addresses? **

On a technical level, the possibility of "malicious nodes" tracking transactions and collecting user IP addresses cannot be ruled out. Especially before it is completely decentralized, this block is a black box. If individual verification nodes collect IP and other information in the name of anti-sybil attacks, in order to optimize the airdrop strategy, it seems reasonable to make sense

Of course, as a leader in zk ecological privacy transactions, I think zkSync will not do such a rebellious thing. But in the face of the raging zkSync frenzy, it is hard not to make people have such inferences and hidden worries.

Here we only discuss the technical logic of whether it can be achieved in theory. As for whether it will happen, as an observer of the zk ecological industry, I tend to remain optimistic. Please judge and respond to the judges who intend to use multiple accounts.

Finally, let me talk about the zkSync rate issue that confuses everyone, especially the interaction rate and failure rate of different projects are very different.

This is essentially a compatibility issue between the smart contract and the bottom layer of zk. If the code logic of the contract itself is complex, and the data structure and Plonk's circuit algorithm optimization are not in place, there will be instability problems. This is bound to become an obstacle for developers to enter the ecology, and I am afraid it will take time to digest.

In this way, it is not difficult to understand why Matterlabs CEO Gluchowski said in an interview that there is no need to issue coins now, and that decentralization will be implemented in the next year. On the one hand, allow enough time for decentralization issues such as Sequencer and zkPorter Validators, and on the other hand, allow enough time for outstanding projects to get in touch with, develop and innovate zk projects to grow the ecology, and of course, it also gives the majority of Luer the opportunity to accumulate blessings.

Remarks: The overall zkSync ecosystem is still in its early stages, and it is extremely challenging and difficult to conduct in-depth research. As a knowledge blogger, my Thread has tried its best to lower the threshold of reading comprehension, so that everyone can understand the technical logic behind it. If there are any imprecise places in the above, friends are welcome to DM for communication. If you find it useful or beneficial, please give me a follow, and thank you for your support by forwarding it three times with one click.