In today's rapidly changing digital money market, the term 'leader' is increasingly misused. What kind of projects can truly be considered leaders? Let's delve into the mysteries behind it.

First of all, market capitalization is a key indicator of a leader's position. A truly leading project must have a considerable market cap, which represents the general recognition of the market. If a project has a negligible market cap yet claims to be a leader, it is nothing but self-deception.

Secondly, the degree of decentralization is an important criterion for judging leader projects. Excessively centralized token distribution often means a lack of genuine market consensus for the project. A true leader project should be open and transparent, allowing a wide range of investors to have the opportunity to participate.

Furthermore, the activity and communication strength of the community ecosystem are equally indispensable. A competent leader project must have strong community support, possess broad influence, and maintain ongoing topicality. This community should not only be popular but also have cohesion and a sense of belonging, capable of attracting new users and maintaining the loyalty of existing users.

Finally, and most importantly, a true leader project must be able to bring actual economic benefits to participants. The market's choice is often the most direct; only projects that can continuously create value for investors are qualified to be called leaders.

In summary, a true leader project should comprehensively lead in multiple dimensions such as market capitalization, degree of decentralization, community ecosystem, and value creation. They do not rely on self-promotion, but rather earn market recognition and respect through actual performance. When evaluating whether a project is a leader, we need to consider these factors comprehensively, rather than being misled by superficial hype.