📢 Gate Square #MBG Posting Challenge# is Live— Post for MBG Rewards!
Want a share of 1,000 MBG? Get involved now—show your insights and real participation to become an MBG promoter!
💰 20 top posts will each win 50 MBG!
How to Participate:
1️⃣ Research the MBG project
Share your in-depth views on MBG’s fundamentals, community governance, development goals, and tokenomics, etc.
2️⃣ Join and share your real experience
Take part in MBG activities (CandyDrop, Launchpool, or spot trading), and post your screenshots, earnings, or step-by-step tutorials. Content can include profits, beginner-friendl
#Trump’s Tax Reform#
The difference between two DEXs on #TON#
The TON blockchain has seen a surge in popularity over the past year, attracting millions of new users through its integration with Telegram and TapTap games that have introduced regular people to the ecosystem. This growth has highlighted two leading DEX exchanges (DEXs): STОNfi and DeDust, which handle most of the token exchanges.
STОNfi is developing the Omnistone protocol, a liquidity aggregation system that pulls from multiple DEXs to provide optimal prices and no slippage offers. This innovation, absent from the DeDust whitepaper, which lacks future plans, positions STОNfi as a forward-thinking platform. Both DEXs offer similar swapping speeds, but the higher total value locked of STОNfi (TVL) in most pairs leads to less slippage, enhancing the user experience.
In terms of the interface, the light blue and white design of STОNfi is intuitive, with clear navigation and readable text. While the DeDust design features black and orange, it has usability issues: group searches are delayed, and navigating back from the group page scrolls back to the top of the list, which frustrates users. The user-friendly interface of STОNfi makes it more accessible to the diverse TON user base.