🎉 #Gate xStocks Trading Share# Posting Event Is Ongoing!
📝 Share your trading experience on Gate Square to unlock $1,000 rewards!
🎁 5 top Square creators * $100 Futures Voucher
🎉 Share your post on X – Top 10 posts by views * extra $50
How to Participate:
1️⃣ Follow Gate_Square
2️⃣ Make an original post (at least 20 words) with #Gate xStocks Trading Share#
3️⃣ If you share on Twitter, submit post link here: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/6854
Note: You may submit the form multiple times. More posts, higher chances to win!
📅 End at: July 9, 16:00 UTC
Show off your trading on Gate Squ
Could Satoshi be a major holder of XRP? CTO of Ripple considers
What if the creator of bitcoin also holds a significant amount of XRP reserves? This is a hypothesis raised by a surprising statement from David Schwartz, CTO of Ripple, during the trial in 2023. Shared again on social media X, this revelation is intriguing. One of the pillars of the XRP Ledger ecosystem hints at a potential connection between Satoshi Nakamoto and Ripple. A remark that went unnoticed at the time but could rearrange the narrative of the emergence of the two largest cryptocurrencies. A statement under oath raises questions In the minutes of the 2023 trial between the SEC and Ripple, a passage once again attracts attention. Shared by user @XrpHodL_ on X (formerly Twitter), this excerpt reveals a direct statement from David Schwartz, CTO of Ripple, which today has sparked renewed interest in the cryptocurrency ecosystem. When asked by the court about the similarities between bitcoin and XRP, David Schwartz temporarily digressed into technical topics and made a particularly intriguing statement: "Toshi, the original creator, may have held a large amount of XRP at that time."
This statement clearly evokes Satoshi Nakamoto, nicknamed "Toshi" in some cryptocurrency groups, and refers to an estimated timeframe around 2017, according to the factors present in the records. This paragraph outlines some specific points: This statement was made in an official legal context, to respond to a question in a U.S. court, which further reinforces its significance; The term "a large amount of XRP" is particularly significant in the context of 2017, a year when the circulating supply of XRP exceeded 38 billion tokens; The implicit connection established between Satoshi Nakamoto and XRP creates a clear distinction from the common notion that Satoshi only knows about bitcoin; This statement does not provide any direct evidence, but its content remains vague enough to rekindle speculations. By bringing this sentence back, the community will rediscover a forgotten part of a meticulously concealed hearing. And if this mention has gone unnoticed until now, it may reignite some hypotheses that have long been set aside. An old hypothesis revived by a random comment. In the same discussion topic on X, a second factor draws attention: a screenshot of the exchange between internet users, in which Tiffany Hayden, a prominent figure in the XRP ecosystem, comments on Schwartz's statement and says sarcastically: "I just want everyone to know that you are definitely Satoshi." David Schwartz has always denied being Satoshi, while repeatedly acknowledging that he contributed to improving the Bitcoin code in the early 2010s. These facts have been documented, especially on technical forums at that time. However, he has never dared to suggest any connection with the early Bitcoin transactions or the "genesis block". His verdict in court, although indirect, thus raises an important question: is it merely a misunderstood technical comment or a disguised confession? Schwartz's statement, although isolated, introduced a new element into the collective imagination of the industry. In the absence of specific evidence, it primarily fuels curiosity and speculation. However, in a universe sensitive to narratives like cryptocurrency, that's enough to reignite the search for Satoshi and redefine some aspects of the story surrounding the key players in the industry. What if the creator of bitcoin is an artificial intelligence?